Head-to-Head Comparison

Polycam vs Luma AI. The creator's comparison.

iPhone LiDAR meshes vs phone-video NeRF — which 3D capture tool fits your output, your accuracy needs, and your pipeline.

Both are creator-first 3D capture tools. Both work from a phone. They produce fundamentally different outputs, and the right pick depends on what you're going to do with the file after the scan finishes.

TL;DR

Polycam wins on accuracy. Luma wins on photorealism.

Polycam's LiDAR mode produces geometrically accurate meshes you can use in CAD, AEC, design, and engineering pipelines. Luma's NeRF/Splat output is photoreal — the better choice when the deliverable is visual immersion, not a measurable model.

Neither is the right call for a local business owner who wants a walkable tour live on their site and Google listing this week without learning new capture or stitching workflows. That's the gap we built TourReady for — $99 once, a short video, two-minute render, hosted free. More on that below →

Two different fundamentals

What these tools actually do.

Both call themselves "3D capture from a phone." The underlying math is different and so are the outputs.

Polycam uses iPhone LiDAR (or photogrammetry on non-Pro phones) to measure depth directly. The output is a 3D mesh, a point cloud, or — in newer versions — a Gaussian Splat plus a 360 pano. The defining property is geometric accuracy. You can measure a wall, drop the model into Rhino or Blender, generate a CAD file, or use it for AEC documentation.

Luma AI uses NeRF and Gaussian Splatting — neural rendering trained on a continuous video walkthrough. The output is a photoreal interactive scene. The defining property is visual realism. The geometry under the hood is implicit and not meant for measurement, but the rendered viewer is the best-looking consumer 3D capture on the market.

That distinction — measurable geometry vs photoreal rendering — is the decision underneath the rest of the comparison.

Feature matrix

The grid creators actually use.

Eleven attributes side-by-side, with TourReady alongside as the local-business reference point.

Attribute Polycam Luma AI TourReady
Upfront cost Free tier; paid ~$15–$40/mo Free tier; paid ~$30–$100+/mo $99 one-time
Recurring cost $15–$40/mo for paid features Usage-based on paid plans $0 — hosted free forever
Capture device iPhone Pro / iPad Pro LiDAR (or photogrammetry on any phone) Any phone — continuous video a short video from any phone
Capture motion Walk perimeter, slow sweep Continuous video walkthrough short video — no walk required
Output format Mesh / point cloud / splat / 360 pano NeRF / Gaussian Splat / web viewer Hosted walkable 3D scene + iframe embed
Geometric accuracy High — LiDAR direct measurement Implicit — not measurable N/A — short-video walkable scene
Visual realism Good for meshes; less photoreal Best in class — photoreal Walkable scene from a short video — improves with capture quality
Render time Minutes for small scans ~30 min to a few hours ~2 minutes
File ownership / export You own the exported files Exports available on paid plans Hosted scene + embed snippet
Embed on your website Yes — web viewer or self-hosted Yes — web viewer / iframe Yes — iframe (no subscription)
Google Business Profile "Street View & 360" badge Manual via Street View Publish API No — output is NeRF, not 360 pano Roadmap (Q3 2026)

Pricing ranges based on publicly available data as of 2026. Subscription pricing changes; check both vendors directly before committing.

Vendor deep dive

What each path is actually like to operate.

The matrix shows the spec. The deep dives show the operating reality.

Polycam

Free + $15–$40/mo iOS-first LiDAR capture Mesh / splat / pano exports

Polycam is a measurement-grade creator tool. LiDAR mode walks you around the space, the iPhone Pro sensor measures depth directly, and you get a mesh you can take into Blender, Rhino, Unreal, or AEC software. Newer versions add Gaussian Splat export and 360 pano export. The defining promise is "you own the files."

Where it wins

  • Geometrically accurate output — usable for measurement and CAD
  • You own the raw 3D files — no vendor lock-in
  • Excellent for AEC, design, real estate floor planning, engineering
  • 360 pano export path enables Street View Publish API uploads
  • Strong community and tutorials

Where it loses

  • LiDAR mode requires an iPhone Pro — photogrammetry on other phones is slower and less accurate
  • Photoreal rendering is not the strong suit — Luma wins on visual feel
  • Multi-room captures require careful walking and stitching
  • Not turnkey for a local business that just wants a website tour

Luma AI

Free + $30–$100+/mo NeRF / Gaussian Splat from video Creator-first

Luma is a neural-rendering platform. Continuous video walkthrough on any phone, cloud reconstruction, photoreal interactive scene plus exportable assets you can use in After Effects, Unreal, Blender, or your own pipeline. The visual quality is the best in the consumer 3D capture category. It's a content tool, not a measurement tool.

Where it wins

  • Best photoreal output of any consumer 3D capture option
  • Generous free tier and strong creator community
  • Captures from any phone — no LiDAR sensor required
  • Excellent for marketing content, hero shots, immersive social
  • Strong integrations with film and motion-design tools

Where it loses

  • Geometry is implicit — not usable for measurement, CAD, or floor plans
  • Video-walk capture is more time-intensive than a LiDAR sweep
  • NeRF/Splat output doesn't fit Google Business Profile's 360-panorama format
  • Render time is longer than Polycam for small scans

TourReady — where we actually fit alongside both

$99 one-time · hosted free Walkable 3D from a short video DIY · 2-min render

Polycam and Luma both expect you to want to be a creator — to do the capture, to learn the tool, to own the file. TourReady is for the operator who doesn't want any of that. They want the walkable 3D scene of their space live on Google, Instagram, and their website this week, with the smallest amount of capture motion possible. One video, two-minute render, $99 once, hosted free for the life of the tour.

Where it wins

  • Lowest cost per tour by an order of magnitude
  • Live in 2 minutes — no walk, no video, no LiDAR sensor
  • Permanent hosting — pay once, keep forever
  • Built into vertical-specific deployment playbooks for 27 industries
  • $99 upfront — tour delivered in minutes, free redo if it's not right, 14-day refund

Where it loses

  • Not for creators who need the raw file in a design pipeline (use Polycam)
  • Not for photoreal brand-campaign hero shots (use Luma)
  • short-video render is best for one room at a time — add $39 bumps for additional rooms
  • Google Business Profile "Street View & 360" badge is on roadmap, not shipped yet

Decision framework

Three operators, three different picks.

The honest matchups.

Pick Polycam if…

You own an iPhone Pro, you need measurable geometry for design, AEC, real estate floor planning, or engineering, and you want to own the raw 3D files. Best for designers, architects, AEC operators, real estate creators, and anyone with a measurement-first workflow.

Pick Luma AI if…

You're a content creator, marketing team, or brand campaign owner. You want photoreal scenes for paid ads, hero sections, social posts, and immersive content. You're comfortable with a continuous video walkthrough and don't need measurement-accurate geometry.

Pick TourReady if…

You're a solo owner or small group, you want the tour live this week without learning a creator tool, and you'd rather pay once than subscribe forever. The $99 covers your first room — add additional rooms at checkout for $39 each.

Don't pick TourReady if…

You need measurable geometry (use Polycam), you need photoreal hero shots for a brand campaign (use Luma), or you need the raw 3D files for a design pipeline (use either).

The honest verdict

Polycam and Luma are both excellent. They're not for the same buyer.

The right comparison isn't feature-vs-feature. It's output-fit-to-job.

If your output goes into a CAD file, a Blender pipeline, a floor plan, or a measurement-grade deliverable — Polycam. The LiDAR sensor exists for exactly this reason.

If your output goes into a paid ad, a hero section, a social post, or an immersive marketing asset — Luma. The neural-rendering quality is what the deliverable needs.

If your output goes onto your Google Business Profile, your booking confirmation email, your website hero, or your Instagram bio — TourReady. The four-surface deployment is what the operating moment looks like.

The point of this page is to help you not pick the wrong path for what you're actually trying to ship. If TourReady fits, the next step is below. If not, the framework above points to who does.

Drill into your industry

Vertical-specific deployment playbooks.

Same comparison, customized for your stack.

Evaluator FAQ

Questions creators ask before they commit.

Drawn from real evaluation conversations.

Is Polycam or Luma AI better for 3D scans?
Different tools for different jobs. Polycam excels at geometrically accurate scans of rooms, objects, and small spaces using iPhone LiDAR — output is a mesh or point cloud you can import into design software. Luma produces photoreal NeRF or Gaussian Splat scenes from a phone video — better for immersive marketing content and hero shots. Polycam wins on accuracy; Luma wins on visual quality.
Do Polycam and Luma AI both work on any phone?
Luma works on any phone — it captures from continuous video. Polycam's flagship LiDAR mode requires an iPhone Pro or iPad Pro with the LiDAR sensor; Polycam's photogrammetry mode runs on any phone but produces less accurate geometry.
Which one is cheaper?
Both have generous free tiers. Polycam paid plans typically run $15–$40/month; Luma paid plans typically run $30–$100+/month depending on usage. For light usage costs are roughly comparable; for heavy usage Polycam tends to be cheaper.
Which one can I embed on a website?
Both provide web viewers and iframe embeds. Luma's NeRF/Splat scenes render smoothly in any modern browser. Polycam exports can be embedded via their web viewer or self-hosted using exported files in a viewer like PlayCanvas or Babylon.js.
Do either publish to Google Business Profile?
Neither natively. Google Business Profile's Street View & 360 section requires equirectangular 360 panoramas uploaded via the Street View app or Street View Publish API. Polycam can export a 360 pano from a LiDAR scan; Luma's NeRF/Splat output cannot be uploaded directly. Matterport is the platform that publishes to Google Business Profile automatically.
What if I just want a tour for my business website?
That's the gap TourReady was built for. Upload a short video, pay $99 upfront and the tour renders in minutes, delivered straight to your inbox, $99 covers permanent hosting. No LiDAR, no video walk, no creator-tool learning curve.

If TourReady is the right call

One video. Walkable in 2 minutes. $99 once. Hosted free.

$99

One-time. Hosted free, forever. No subscription, no setup fees.

Delivered in minutes Hosted free forever Free redo · 14-day refund
See my tour in 2 minutes →

$99 upfront. Tour delivered in minutes. Free redo if it's not right and a full refund inside 14 days.

Two-minute render · live tour link + embed snippet + platform guides + four-surface deployment walkthrough

Add more rooms for $39 each at checkout — bundle pricing for the same business.